Skip to content

Dark Web Overview

The Dark Web Overview is the landing page for the Dark Web module. It rolls up findings from four underground intelligence sources — third-party breach dumps, info-stealer malware logs, ransomware/forum discussions, and Telegram channels — into a single view that answers three questions fast: which of your domains are exposed, which users and executives are compromised, and whether dark-web activity against you is trending up.

Overview

Dark Web Overview

The page is organized top to bottom:

  • A date-range selector in the header (top-right).
  • A metrics strip of four headline KPIs.
  • A Threat Trends panel with two year-over-year bar charts.
  • Most Impacted Domains (with an All / Priority toggle) and Most Impacted Users side by side.
  • Most Impacted Executives below them.
  • A Feeds sidebar on the right showing the module's Security Rating and a live, filterable activity feed.

Everything here is a roll-up. The activity feed links each finding back to its record-level module — Data Breaches, Stealer Logs, Discussions, and Telegram — where you triage and act on individual findings. The KPI cards, ranked lists, and trend charts are read-only summaries; use the left-hand navigation or a feed item to open the underlying module.

How it works

The mechanics below are not visible in the UI but determine exactly what each number means.

The underlying sources

The overview aggregates from four feed pipelines (the four categories you can filter the activity feed by), plus a fifth source label — Compromised User Data Auctions — that contributes only to the Most Impacted Domains ranking. Knowing which source feeds which widget tells you what a count actually represents:

SourceWhat it collectsFeeds
Third Party Data BreachesYour domains/emails appearing in breach corpora and dump repositoriesDomains, Users, Executives, Compromised Users chart, Feed
Malware Compromised PasswordsCredentials harvested by info-stealer malware (stealer logs)Domains, Users, Executives, Compromised Users chart, Feed
Compromised User Data AuctionsStealer-log datasets sold/auctioned, mapped to your domainsMost Impacted Domains only
Ransomware Groups & ForumsRansomware leak-site posts and deep-web forum discussions naming youDark Web Conversations chart, Feed
Telegram ConversationsThreat-actor Telegram channels/groups mentioning your organizationFeed

What each hero metric counts

The four KPI cards are computed server-side from the same impacted-systems, impacted-users, and impacted-executives data that drives the ranked lists, scoped to the date range you select in the header. The "Dark Web Mentions" card is pulled from the Discussions summary for the same window.

KPI cardWhat it counts
Compromised UsersSum of impacted user records across Third Party Data Breaches + Malware Compromised Passwords
Impacted DomainsNumber of distinct domains/subdomains appearing across all impacted-systems sources
Executives at RiskSum of impacted records tied to your configured executive list (breaches + malware)
Dark Web MentionsTotal discussion/conversation mentions of your organization (Discussions summary)

The card subtitle echoes the active date preset (e.g. "Last 30 days") so the number and its window stay consistent.

Priority domains

The All / Priority toggle on Most Impacted Domains splits results using your priority (relevant) domains configuration. A domain counts as "priority" when it has been assigned a priority level above zero in settings. Internally the page fetches priority domains separately and partitions every impacted-domain result into the two buckets, so the two views never overlap. Use Priority to focus on crown-jewel assets and suppress the noise of low-value domains.

Trend charts are scoped by calendar year

The Threat Trends charts plot one bar per month (Jan–Dec) for a single calendar year. They are driven by their own per-chart year navigation, not by the header date preset. The two charts navigate independently:

  • Compromised Users plots two series per month — third-party-breach users and malware-compromised users.
  • Dark Web Conversations plots monthly ransomware/forum discussion volume.

Use the chevron buttons beside each chart's year label to move between years. The forward button is disabled once you reach the current year. If a year has no positive activity, the chart is replaced by an inline "No data" state rather than rendering an empty axis.

Ranked lists are top-10, sorted by count

Most Impacted Domains, Users, and Executives each flatten their per-source groups into a single list, sort descending by count, and show the top 10. The small label on the right of each row tells you which source the row came from (e.g. Third Party Data Breaches, Malware Compromised Passwords, Compromised User Data Auctions). Executives are restricted to the people configured in your organization's executive list.

Understanding the data

Most Impacted Domains

A flat, ranked list of the domains and subdomains appearing most often in dark-web data.

ElementMeaning
Count badgeNumber of findings tied to that domain/subdomain
Domain / subdomainThe asset; if a subdomain is present it is shown with its parent domain beneath
Source labelWhich pipeline produced the row (breaches, malware, or auctions)
All / Priority toggleSwitch between all impacted domains and only your priority domains

Most Impacted Users and Executives

ElementMeaning
Count badgeNumber of dark-web findings for that identity
NameThe impacted user identifier (email/username) or executive
Source labelThird Party Data Breaches or Malware Compromised Passwords

A high count for one user

A single user appearing repeatedly in Malware Compromised Passwords usually points to a persistently infected device — the same machine re-uploading fresh stealer logs. Treat it as a device-compromise investigation, not just a password reset.

Feeds sidebar

The right rail shows two things:

  • Security Rating — the letter grade and score for the Dark Web category. A muted "—" means the score has not loaded for this tenant (it is not a failing grade).
  • Feeds — recent dark-web findings in reverse-chronological order, each with a source icon, a human-readable title, a "… ago" timestamp, and a link into the originating module.

Filter the feed with the dropdown. The categories are:

FilterSource
Third Party Data BreachesBreach dumps
Malware Compromised PasswordsStealer logs
Ransomware Groups & ForumsRansomware leak sites + deep-web forums
Telegram ConversationsTelegram channels

Selecting none shows everything; selecting one or more narrows the feed. The feed paginates as you scroll.

The header dropdown sets the time window for the page. It scopes the hero KPI cards and the ranked lists; the Threat Trends charts use their own per-year navigation instead (see below). Presets:

PresetWindow
Last 7 daysRolling 7 days
Last 30 daysRolling 30 days (default)
Last 90 daysRolling 90 days
All timeEntire history

Your selection is remembered per browser via local storage, so the page reopens on the range you last used.

Taking action

The overview is a triage springboard, not a workspace — you resolve findings in the underlying modules:

  1. Spot the exposure on the overview (a spiking trend, a priority domain near the top, an executive in the list).
  2. Open the source module — click a feed item to jump straight to its record, or use the left-hand navigation to open Data Breaches, Stealer Logs, Discussions, or Telegram.
  3. Triage the records there — review, mark status, request credential resets, or initiate takedowns where supported.

Read access

Viewing this page requires the Dark Web Overview read permission. Your administrator manages this under member roles.

Common questions

Why does "Compromised Users" show a big number when the trend chart for this year is empty? The hero cards and the trend chart use different windows. The cards follow the header date preset, while each trend chart shows only the calendar year you've navigated to. A large card total alongside an empty current-year chart usually means the compromises landed in an earlier year — page back through the chart's year navigation to find them.

What's the difference between the "All" and "Priority" domain views? "All" is every impacted domain; "Priority" is restricted to domains you've flagged as high-value (priority level above zero) in your relevant-domains settings. Use Priority to cut through noise from low-value or parked domains.

The Dark Web Conversations chart is empty — does that mean we're safe? It means no ransomware leak-site posts or deep-web forum discussions naming your organization were collected in that year. It does not cover stealer-log credentials or breach data — those are tracked by the Compromised Users chart and the breach/stealer modules.

What does the source label on each row mean? It attributes the finding to its collection pipeline (e.g. Malware Compromised Passwords vs Third Party Data Breaches). The same domain or user can appear under more than one source because the same identity may be exposed in multiple ways.

Why is the Security Rating showing "—"? The Dark Web category score hasn't loaded for your tenant yet. It is a placeholder, not a zero or an F.

  • Data Breaches — record-level third-party breach findings that feed the impacted-domains, users, and executives rankings.
  • Stealer Logs — malware-harvested credentials behind the "Malware Compromised Passwords" source and the Compromised Users metric.
  • Compromised Computers — the infected devices that produced the stealer-log credentials.
  • Discussions — ransomware leak-site and forum posts that drive the Dark Web Conversations chart.
  • Telegram — threat-actor Telegram activity surfaced in the feed.
  • Credit Card Leaks — payment-card exposure tracked alongside the dark-web sources.
  • Leaked Credentials — credentials found on open/public sources, distinct from the dark-web stealer and breach pipelines here.
  • Security Rating — dark-web findings contribute to the category grade shown in the Feeds sidebar.

ShadowMap - External Attack Surface Management